[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sqp() with trapz()
From: |
Przemek Klosowski |
Subject: |
Re: sqp() with trapz() |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2019 14:38:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
On 8/26/19 2:32 PM, dg.aragones wrote:
Yes, but I don't understand why, because they have also the same size. They
are both 51x1 vectors.
Nope, one is 1x51 and the other is 51x1.
By using @ functions, it's harder to debug this because you can't put
tests/printouts into them, so I redefined them to use the function
trapz_debug, and defined it like so:
function f = trapz_debug (a, b)
size (a)
size (b)
f = trapz (a, b)
endfunction
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), (continued)
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), fibonacci4, 2019/08/25
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), dg.aragones, 2019/08/25
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), fibonacci4, 2019/08/25
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), dg.aragones, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), fibonacci4, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), fibonacci4, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), dg.aragones, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), fibonacci4, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), Przemek Klosowski, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), dg.aragones, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(),
Przemek Klosowski <=
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), dg.aragones, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), Nicholas Jankowski, 2019/08/26
- Re: sqp() with trapz(), dg.aragones, 2019/08/26
Re: sqp() with trapz(), Doug Stewart, 2019/08/25