|
From: | Przemek Klosowski |
Subject: | Re: vectorise for loop in Octave |
Date: | Mon, 11 May 2020 19:41:34 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
On 5/11/20 5:41 PM, AURORA GONZALEZ
VIDAL wrote:
'eval' and creating custom named variables seem to me the
opposite to vectorization, which usually leverages Octave's "do
this over the entire multidimentional array" operation. What exactly are you trying to do? Why do you believe that node1 is better than node(1,:)?
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |