Re: [Help-smalltalk] Patch to add unsigned int support...

[David Forster]

On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:54:26AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> > I've tested this with both passing uints/ulongs and returning them.
> > I've also testing sending true/false to functions asking for
> > ulongs/uints.  I've also, of course, tested all this against large
> > ints (2^32-1) and things seem to all work OK.
> 
> Have you tried sending them to regular #int's? Returning uInts
> makes sense, but passing them should be equivalent to
> passing ints.
> 
 
You're right... IMHO, however, I think it's still a good idea to
accept #uLong and #uInt as arguments for readability and symmetry.
I've attached a revised patch...

-Dave

uint.diff
Description: Text document