help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax


From: Sungjin Chun
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] [RFC] Smalltalk scripting syntax
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:50:24 +0900
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

In fact, I just want more less typing and easy-to-remember syntax for
this. +/- is just from my experience in Obj-C. Other syntax which is
rather simple will be OK.

Sungjin.

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> What about +/- for class/instance method like Objective-C? I think your
>> example is rather complex for defining class/instance method. For other
>> parts I actually does not have good/bad points.
> 
> If I head written #new as an instance method, for example, I think
> Stefan (or somebody else for him) could have spotted the problem
> with this syntax.  I find instead very confusing to remember which
> of +/- is a class and which is an instance method.
> 
> Also, UML has hijacked +/- for public/private respectively, which
> can only add to the confusion.
> 
> Paolo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF8gDQQqspS1+XJHgRAku0AKDgvnF5Qb/CByOy0M/wflv5qyEJmgCgqtIY
Pks9et8zZGqg+taWZJ0P0OY=
=ufPY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]