[Help-smalltalk] Re: I can't find out where the error is

[Canol Gokel]

Stephen Compall <s11 <at> member.fsf.org> writes:

> 
> Well, considering that the backtrace is innermost-first, it's pretty
> clear that the specific #value message is one within the method
> True>>and:, not one you wrote yourself (unless you changed that method
> for some reason).  So you are looking for an #and: that you wrote, not a
> #value.  I would guess that you passed a non-block as the argument.
>

But I also have a lot of and: messages in my code so again finding the right one
is difficult.

Actually, I corrected the error by trial and error method ( ;-) ), but it is
really difficult and I face this situation a lot in GNU Smalltalk.