[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:33:55 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 09:32:08PM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> Have noticed that when using @image for html output, setting
> the width and height fails.
Not sure what you mean about that, but it is documented that
The optional WIDTH and HEIGHT arguments to the '@image' command (see the
previous section) specify the size to which to scale the image. They
are only taken into account in TeX.
--
Pat
- Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/16
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/16
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Gavin Smith, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Gavin Smith, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Christopher Dimech, 2020/11/19
- Re: Width and Height in @image for Html Output fail, Gavin Smith, 2020/11/19