Re: stampede hd0*

[Thomas Bushnell, BSG]

Roland McGrath <address@hidden> writes:

> That was the obvious change and the reason I did different was so as not to
> affect either way the bit's presence in the argument to
> diskfs_validate_mode_change.  It makes no difference to the only existing
> implementation of that function (ext2fs), but I was being gratuitously
> conservative.  I've checked in the change you suggested.

Ah, gotcha.

> I am concerned about the handling of S_ITRANS bits in other places.  I have
> not checked thoroughly, but I suspect more inconsistencies.
> e.g. diskfs_create_node calls do not mask out the S_ITRANS bits and so they
> can wind up in dn_stat.st_mode when diskfs_read_node was never called.

Yeah, there may be some problems like that.