[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Differing release name and source version.
From: |
Mats Erik Andersson |
Subject: |
Differing release name and source version. |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:44:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hello there,
I noticed the job 20977014, which is 'coverage' for GNU Inetutils,
that it is claimed to be for release
inetutils-1.9.2.59-3e7d-dirty
but in fact it is using the change
3e7df6 to ae6b5b of inetutils
Thus the correct release name should be
inetutils-1.9.2.60-ae6b-dirty
The problem is that the project GNU Inetutils happened to push
a further commit between 'tarball' and 'coverage'. In fact, the
very same incorrectness is true for 20977016/manual. The job
20977015/tarball is displaying correct versioning.
It seems as if the secondary jobs, depending an a previous tarball,
are using the most recent upstream source, ignoring the versioning
claimed by the tarball dependency. Since the job 'manual' is building
the Nix packages, you have a race condition resulting in faulty
source tracking.
Best regards,
Mats Erik Andersson, on behalf of GNU Inetutils
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Differing release name and source version.,
Mats Erik Andersson <=