|
From: | Richard Geddes |
Subject: | Re: [igraph] Getting the latest development version of igraph |
Date: | Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:00:51 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) |
G, I followed the steps and completed the following commands with output to cerr (the return value indicates no error though) -------- $0> tla register-archive http://cneurocvs.rmki.kfki.hu/arch/address@hidden Failed to access file '.archive-version' Could not determine archive format, guessing to be tla 1.0 Registering archive: address@hidden $0> tla my-default-archive address@hidden $0> tla get igraph--main--0.5 igraph-dev-0.5 Failed to access file '.archive-version' Could not determine archive format, guessing to be tla 1.0 * from archive cached: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-250 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-251 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-252 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-253 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-254 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-255 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-256 * patching for revision: address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5--patch-257 * making pristine copy * tree version set address@hidden/igraph--main--0.5 -------- I assume nothing major from the 'Failed..' messages as tla continued until a copy of the igraph-dev-0.5 directory was built. I installed autoconf, automake, and libtool. Hopefully that is all I will need. I previously installed igraph-0.4.4 on this system. I haven't run these programs yet: ./bootstrap.sh ./configure make make install - should I be root (sudo) to run these programs? - will there be a conflict between the two versions? If not, will there be a way to discriminate between the two versions on my system? What would you advise in this case? Thank you R Gabor Csardi wrote: Richard, that sounds easy, I mean it is easy to install the required tools for Ubuntu. I'm running igraph on a 64 machines myself, for graphs about the same size, most of the time not even from C, but from GNU R. I don't think there will be any problems. G. On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:40:18AM -0500, Richard Geddes wrote:Gabor, Thanks for the info.� I'll give it a try and let you know if I encounter problems. I have 2 systems: - my development system (32-bit Ubuntu 7.10 desktop with GUI and Eclipse) - my production system - 64-bit Ubuntu 7.10 server - no GUI, basically stripped down linux to run programs on large graphs - up to 5 million nodes and up to 25 million edges.� The values produced in analysis can overflow the 32-bit machine. So far, non-igraph programs running in both my systems have no problems... should I expect any difficulties in moving to the 64-bit machine for igraph libraries? Thank you Richard[...] |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |