[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.
From: |
Tim McNamara |
Subject: |
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document. |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 17:07:38 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) |
Craig Kelley <namonai@that.google.thingy> writes:
> On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 13:17:34 -0500, Tim McNamara wrote:
>
>> 4. Emacs by default creates backup documents, you'll find them in
>> the same directory as the file you were working on with a tilde
>> after the filename. Hopefully XEmacs, which I've never used,
>> does the same thing.
>
> The tilde document is the last version; the auto backup will be the
> filename surrounded by hash marks (#).
Thanks for that- if Emacs ever crashes while I'm editing a docuent,
I'll know what to look for.
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., (continued)
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Richard Taylor, 2004/09/16
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., David Kastrup, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., spike1, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., GreyCloud, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Tim McNamara, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Craig Kelley, 2004/09/17
- Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.,
Tim McNamara <=
- Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Mike Cox, 2004/09/17
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Adrian Aichner, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Jesper Harder, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, Tim McNamara, 2004/09/18
- Re: Which is better, xemacs or gnu emacs?, kier, 2004/09/18
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Brian Palmer, 2004/09/18