Re: What happened to Sather

[Keith Hopper]

In article <address@hidden>,
   Norbert Nemec <address@hidden> wrote:

> Seems like Jeff Regan has already started out on his plans back then, but 
> lost 
> it out of sight during the time of silence last month. From my point of view, 
> Sather could really proceed on SourceForge, but I do not have the time to 
> take 
> any steps myself.

> I have an old CVS repository here on my local machine, containing the 
> versions from 0.something (at ISCI) all through 1.3beta7 (beta8 is not worked 
> in, yet)

> I do not know whether it is wiser to transfer that repository to SourceForge 
> (and have a historical archive that way) or start out a new repository there, 
> beginning at version 1.3beta8

     As my note to the news group said - I expect that another week or so
will see 1.3 clear through the uni-processor concurrency tests - to all
intents and purposes I propose going no further until we get into the new
compiler/RTE next year - ie 1.3 is 1.3 after roughly the end of next week.

     Other library work here is continuing - but has nothing to do with 1.3
per se.  I hope others working on other libraries see this as being the way
to go.  Back to stuff for teaching - I have a new course starting tomorrow
and, as ever I am a few days behind (or something)!!!

                Keith

-- 
City Desk
Waikato University
[PGP key available if desired]