[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed? |
Date: |
31 Jan 2002 14:08:20 +0000 |
"Aaron M. Renn" <address@hidden> writes:
> My style is already similar to that. I do prefer the GNU C style that
> puts the function name in column 0. This makes it extremely easy to
> search for methods by name, esp. in vi ;)
Yes Aaron. But the rest of us hate it /8-)
Nic
- [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Aaron M. Renn, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Tom Tromey, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31