[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed? |
Date: |
31 Jan 2002 19:10:29 -0700 |
>>>>> "Nic" == Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> writes:
Nic> Ok. I've done some scans and found that we have more code formatted
Nic> with the indentation than we do formtted without, though indentation
Nic> of these lines _at all_ is rare.
The rule I follow when writing code is to try to put everything on one
line. If it doesn't fit, I break the line before either "extends" or
"implements", or sometimes both.
Nic> When files are not formatted with indented lines they are formatted
Nic> with the "extends" and "includes" on the same line as the class decl.
Nic> That's very bad but perhaps it's not noticably bad to most of
Nic> you.
The gcj t-shirt puts both "implements" and "extends" on separate
lines, and both are indented. An important datum :-)
Tom
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, (continued)
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Per Bothner, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Brian Jones, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Nic Ferrier, 2002/01/31
- Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?,
Tom Tromey <=
Re: [Javaweb-people] So are we agreed?, Bryce McKinlay, 2002/01/31