|
From: | Ricardo Lafuente |
Subject: | Re: Notes on the web page |
Date: | Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:11:53 +0100 |
Hello Libor,
Thank you for the detailed write-up! We took care of a few changes following your suggestions, and others probably need some discussion. Here's what's fixed:
Other notes on open issues:
Cheers!
A&R
Hello all,
as promised on the meeting, I went through the pages at https://jsr.manufacturaindependente.org/.
* I suggest moving "Known issues" to the developer notes
* Maybe "Level descriptions" is a better name for the "Configuring" link; but we will likely get rid of levels so there probably be a differnt content and Configuring or Configuration can be better names
* I think that we should redesign the "WRAPPERS" section:
* Maybe we can use "KEY PROTECTION" (or a better name) as a heading
* Below should be "Network Boundary Shield" description https://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~polcak/jsr/doxygen/html/group__NBS.html
* Option A) There can be a single Wrapper link pointing to a page like https://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~polcak/jsr/doxygen/html/group__wrappers.html; on this page we can provide some information what are the wrappers trying to achive, e.g., Fingerprinting protection: Battery, Device memory, Geolocation, Canvas, ...; Microarchitectural attacks: Performance, Time; Real world movement trackging: Geolocation; etc.
* Option B) Have the groups like Fingerprinting protection, Microrchitectural attacks, Real world movement trackging directly in the main menu
* I like the option B more because users probably do not care if we wrapped some API or achieved the goal through a different mechanism (like the NSB case)
* As devs can be interested what is a wrapper, I propose to keep the wrapper description https://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~polcak/jsr/doxygen/html/group__wrappers.html but moving it to "Developer notes" above "Making a new wrapper" or "Making a new wrapper can be added to the wrapper description page.
* https://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~polcak/jsr/doxygen/html/md_tests_common_files_webbrowser_drivers_DOWNLOAD_WEB_DRIVERS_HERE.html is probably missing. But it seems that the info is already in the "Running (integration|system) tests" pages. So it should not be a problem. Martin, can you clarify?
* We will have developers working on different branches (right now we have master, maintain0.4, and maybe nscl). Would it make sense to have several version of the developer notes? For example see the top panel in python docs (e.g. https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html).
Thanks again for the work on the pages,
Libor
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |