[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I am going to raise the minimal Firefox version for the next release
From: |
Michael McMahon |
Subject: |
Re: I am going to raise the minimal Firefox version for the next release and thoughts on the minimal version in general |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2023 09:22:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/102.15.1 |
I'm fine with bumping the minimum version to current esr 115 or previous
esr 102. My thought process is that using an unsupported browser tends
to add more vulnerabilities than our extension solves.
Best,
Michael McMahon | Web Developer, Free Software Foundation
GPG Key: 4337 2794 C8AD D5CA 8FCF FA6C D037 59DA B600 E3C0
https://fsf.org
Submit your session for LibrePlanet 2024: https://u.fsf.org/40g
US government employee? Use CFC charity code 63210 to support us through
the Combined Federal Campaign. https://cfcgiving.opm.gov/
On 10/12/23 02:23, Libor Polčák wrote:
Hello,
see
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2023/10/05/changes-to-android-extension-signing/. TLDR: We will need to add a key to manifest.json to support Firefox for Android. One comment claims that Firefox 60 and 68 does not handle that key well. Firefox 78 appears to load such extension fine.
We have about 8 daily Firefox for Android users. We have likely a single
user using Firefox 71alpha using JShelter about once a week. Other users
use Firefox 78 or greater (in the last month). I am going to raise the
minimal version to Firefox 78 and add the Android key. There is no need
in rushing to release a new version so if you have objections, let me know.
Also, I guess that we might need to raise the minimal version further
once we go for the changes in the extension to support Mv3. Giorgio, do
you know if the changes for Android that you plan to push soon will
affect the minimal supported version?
Anyway looking at the stats from the last month, more than 91.9% of the
users were using at least Firefox 115 (current ESR) or above each day
with the median of 94.7%. These numbers go to minimum of 95.3% and
median of 96.9% when we count also Firefox 102 which was the previous
ESR version. I interpret the numbers that users gradually shift from the
previous ESR to the current one.
Looking at the absolute numbers between 13 and 24 users were using
Firefox 114 or earlier (not counting 102 ESR) in each day with the
median of 16. 2 to 8 people used Firefox 101 or earlier in each day.
So if we raise the minimal version to 102 we will affect only few people
(possibly less than 10). Also the affected users might update by the
time we raise the minimal versions.
Best wishes
Libor