Re: [Klog-devel] Klog-devel Digest, Vol 1, Issue 134

[Jaime Robles]

Hello Andrew,

Once we have completed this release, having all the functionality of  
KLog 0.4.7 and the bugs we find, we should start thinking on new  
features.

One possibility for this saving would be backround saving.

By the way, do you really think that saving is too slow and need some  
work?

Jaime

El 30/09/2009, a las 21:40, Andrew Goldie <address@hidden 
> escribió:

> Hi Jaime,
>
> Yes I thought that might be the case with the logfile writing, we  
> can just
> uncomment out the orginal code and take out the my changes. Maybe we  
> could
> look at one of the following for saving quicker :
>
> 1. Append the log with changes that have been made since the last  
> save.
> 2. Create a "save log" when a qso is added to that all that needs to  
> be done
> is just a quick file write without all the logic surrounding it.
>
> I'll keep thinking about it!
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:01:56 address@hidden  
> wrote:
> > Send Klog-devel mailing list submissions to
> >    address@hidden
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >    https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/klog-devel
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >    address@hidden
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >    address@hidden
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Klog-devel digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. [Fwd: [Klog-svn] r35 - trunk/src] (Jaime Robles)
> >
> >
> > --- 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:58:07 +0200 (CEST)
> > From: "Jaime Robles" <address@hidden>
> > Subject: [Klog-devel] [Fwd: [Klog-svn] r35 - trunk/src]
> > To: address@hidden
> > Message-ID:
> >    <address@hidden>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> >
> >
> > Good morning (here).
> >
> > Just a quick comment regarding the logs...
> >
> > I still have not tested this R35 update but I don't agree to remove  
> > the
> > "if" statements as it will (as you already said) increase the  
> > logfile with
> > no useful information.
> >
> > Reading the logfile will be a longer process as it will have to  
> > read ALL
> > the tags.
> > ADIF files are sometime edited by the user with a text editor... we  
> > should
> > keep them easy to read/understand.
> >
> > The specification[1] does not forbid what you are proposing but I  
> > think it
> > would not be a best practice.
> > If you think that we should improve the writting speed... IMHO we  
> > should
> > think how to optimize the function but keeping the log short and  
> > concise,
> > with all the needed data but simple and "good looking" :-)
> >
> > Regarding the TODO... maybe we should manage this in the TODO file,  
> > or
> > maybe using a bug tracker... I think Berlios offers one.
> >
> >
> > [1] http://www.adif.org/adif223.htm
>
>
>
> Attention:
> This email may contain information intended for the sole use of
> the original recipient. Please respect this when sharing or
> disclosing this email's contents with any third party. If you
> believe you have received this email in error, please delete it
> and notify the sender or address@hidden as
> soon as possible. The content of this email does not necessarily
> reflect the views of Solnet Solutions Ltd.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Klog-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/klog-devel