[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Koha-devel] New release candidates
From: |
Shane Williams |
Subject: |
Re: [Koha-devel] New release candidates |
Date: |
Mon Jul 22 12:11:04 2002 |
If I've got time to test only one of these, which is more important?
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tonnesen Steve wrote:
>
> I've uploaded two new release candidates to sourceforge:
>
> 1.2.2RC4 Fixes minor problems in 1.2.1
>
> RC3 was downloaded over 200 times from sourceforge and I heard few
> complaints. The changes in RC4 are small and shouldn't cause any new
> problems. If I don't hear any complaints, I think we should release 1.2.2
> based on RC4 tomorrow.
>
>
> Changes in RC4:
>
> - installer.pl asks for the location of apache's config file if it
> can't find it
> - Fix to updatedatabase script that fixes a problem with full
> acquisitions
> - Fixed bad link in detail.tmpl (pointed to intradev.katipo.co.nz)
>
>
>
>
> 1.2.3RC5 - major changes: templating and authentication module
>
> RC4 was only downloaded 12 times. I suspect that this one needs a lot
> more testing. I think that putting the release candidates in the
> koha-unstable project reduces the likelihood of people installing them on
> production systems but also reduces the amount of testing that gets done
> on release candidates? Not that I'm complaining. The first effect makes
> it well worth it. :)
>
>
> Changes in RC5:
>
> - Fix to Auth.pm that broke basic authentication feature
> - Fix to updatedatabase fixes problem with full acquisitions
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Koha-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/koha-devel
>
--
Public key #7BBC68D9 at | Shane Williams
http://pgp.mit.edu/ | Systems Administrator UT-GSLIS
=----------------------------------+-------------------------------
All syllogisms contain three lines | address@hidden
Therefore this is not a syllogism | www.gslis.utexas.edu/~shanew