On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:09:14PM -0500, Sebastian Hammer wrote:
I don't think you should be using file record IDs when you update
records using Z39.50.
Right, I see that now, as Paul's set it up in CVS, we're using
general record IDs stored in the 090$c field in the MARC records.
So for _new_ cataloging, we're going to have to generate the 090$c
field for every MARC record we plan to import, then we'll 'update'
the Zebra index, and if we're using shadow registers, this process
will be fault-tolerant.