Re: [Libcdio-devel] Place for test documentation

[Rocky Bernstein]

I agree that the detailed attention and unique knowledge that Thomas has
needs wider distribution.

And in general, when people are interested in doing something, I say, let's
go for it!

I think the information on how the test data was generated should at be in
the tarball. It is always better to err on giving too much information than
not enough. You probably know this already but adding files is simply done
by adding it to the EXTRA_DIST variable in Makefile.am

As to where, why not put it just in doc with a suitable filename?  We can
also have it on the libcdio website too. There is a SVN-controlled
repository for that.

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Leon Merten Lohse <address@hidden>
wrote:

> I found some time to work on the unit test for the CD-Text parser
> again.
> Thomas compiled some quite detailed documentation on how the test data
> was generated, including some human readable source files. It would be
> a shame if we did not include that.
> Where would you say, Rocky, is the best place for that documentation?
> How about a new directory test/doc?
> Would we include that in the distribution tarballs and therefor
> need to integrate it in the build system? What do you think?
>
> Best regards
> Leon
>
>