[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper
From: |
KO Myung-Hun |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2 |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2016 13:03:24 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120715 Firefox/10.0.6esrpre SeaMonkey/2.7.2 |
Hi/2.
Rocky Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 6:12 AM, KO Myung-Hun <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Rocky Bernstein wrote:
>>> Let's hold off applying the patches until
>>>
>>> 1. the FSF papers have gone through. (Have they?)
>>
>> Not yet.
>>
>>> 2. you have a server set up that I can access this and can
>>> compile and test the code.
>>>
>>
>> No other ways than setting up a server ?
>>
>>> You have yet to give a reason as to why this can't be maintained as
>>> a separate repository.
>>>
>>
>> 1. Upstream code quality is always better than downstream because
>> submitted patches can be reviewed.
>>
>
> I'll be happy to review changes in the OS/2 repository.
>
Then, why is fork needed ?
>
>> 2. It becomes harder and harder to maintain in forked repository with
>> time passed because patch sets are more and more.
>>
>
> I don't see that. You can just go off a release that occurs now about
> once every year
> or two. The os2 changes are basically confined to one file plus whatever
> tests there
> are.
>
I think, this is true for libcdio repo itself.
> Hmm. That reminds me. There is currently no os2 driver test in tests/driver
> like
> there is for other os's. That probably needs to be fixed too.
>
Ok.
>
>
>>> Others reading libcdio devel: is there anyone interested in seeing
>> libcdio
>>> continue
>>> on OS/2 and is willing to spend time on it?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Rocky Bernstein <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:34 AM, KO Myung-Hun <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rocky Bernstein wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:39 AM, KO Myung-Hun <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What I meant was how I could connect to the server of *other
>>>>>>> platforms/OSes* not OS/2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only platform where we have remote access is for Solaris. When the
>>>>> FSF
>>>>>> stuff is squared, let's discuss
>>>>>> opencsw.org access then if you want access to that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For linux, OSX, and windows, libcdio developers have those OS's
>>>>> available
>>>>>> somehow so there's no need right now to have accessible via the
>>>>> Internet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OS/2 like Solaris and BSDi (when it was supported) are a bit different
>>>>> in
>>>>>> that they are less used and less common, and it is unreasonable to
>>>>> expect
>>>>>> libcdio developers to want to or have to run those to do testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And should it be 24/7 ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. With BSDi all that mattered is that when someone made a request to
>>>>> try
>>>>>> it, a BSDi box was spun up in a reasonable amount of time. And when
>>>>> actual
>>>>>> CD and DVD testing was done, there was a CD or DVD in the server. (Or
>>>>> not
>>>>>> if we needed no media)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It's possible to setup SSH server on OS/2. However, it's hard to run
>> the
>>>>> server publicly when requested. No other ways ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure, keep it running all the time. That work, and is less hassle on the
>>>> libcdio
>>>> developer side.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And I sent some patches. However, it does not include
>>>>> get_track_pregap_lba_os2(), because any drivers other than images did
>>>>> not implement it and libcdio describes that get_track_pregap_lba_os2()
>>>>> works on images.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok. That make sense.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In case of SCSI sense reply, OS/2 DosDevIOCtl() seems not to support
>> it.
>>>>> So it's not possible in current implementation.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok. Can the implementation be redone so we get a SCSI sense reply?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> KO Myung-Hun
>>>>>
>>>>> Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2
>>>>> Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
>>>>> In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM
>>>>>
>>>>> Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> KO Myung-Hun
>>
>> Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2
>> Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
>> In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM
>>
>> Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr
>>
>>
>>
>
--
KO Myung-Hun
Using Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.7.2
Under OS/2 Warp 4 for Korean with FixPak #15
In VirtualBox v4.1.32 on Intel Core i7-3615QM 2.30GHz with 8GB RAM
Korean OS/2 User Community : http://www.ecomstation.co.kr
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, (continued)
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/06
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2016/12/07
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2016/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2016/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2016/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/12
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2,
KO Myung-Hun <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2016/12/20
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/20
- [Libcdio-devel] FSF Copyright: was Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Thomas Schmitt, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] FSF Copyright: was Re: [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, Rocky Bernstein, 2016/12/21
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] [PATCH] Remove unnecessary high-memory safe wrapper for DosDevIOCtl() on OS/2, KO Myung-Hun, 2016/12/12