Re: [Libcdio-devel] Rock Ridge and libisofs/xorriso 'AL' extension

[Pete Batard]

On 2017.07.26 15:34, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> So it is now unclear why Pete did not get the long Joliet names from libcdio,
> which are quite the same as the Rock Ridge names.

I can answer that: In the application where I am seeing the issue, we 
only call on iso9660_name_translate_ext() for Joliet translation if Rock 
Ridge extensions are not present. In other words we set Rock Ridge to 
have have precedence over Joliet (though we do provide a flag to disable 
Rock Ridge altogether if the user wants to force Joliet).

I guess if we had done the opposite, we probably never would have picked 
this issue...

Regards,

/Pete