|
From: | Alyona Morozov |
Subject: | Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Liberty-eiffel Digest, Vol 26, Issue 6 |
Date: | Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:27:16 +0100 |
And also a patch to make LibertyEiffel C output compatible with
Microsoft VisualC compiler is welcome, so why not for PellesC? But yes,
there is a difference between supporting a compiler and propagating its
use by inclusion.
BTW: I adjusted the GSoC idea and replaced PellesC by MingW but I kept
the "e. g.". - In the hope this is political acceptable for all :
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |