[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Option synonims
From: |
Raphael Mack |
Subject: |
Re: Option synonims |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:07:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Am Dienstag, dem 15.03.2022 um 14:14 +0100 schrieb Paolo Redælli:
> Do we know that we may use "--" instead of "-" and "-" instead of "_"
> in
> options?
>
> I.e.: -no_warning --no_warning -no-warning and --no-warning are all
> synonims for the same option.
>
> Shall I make it a little more known, perhaps changing the help
> message?
I even do not like to have so many different version of the same thing
:-) and for command line options my personal opinion is that eiffelish
names are not the best practice, we should stick to what is normal on
the command line. -> I would be fine to remove the _ and -xxxx options
from the command line help. One release later we could then issue a
warning that the old names are obsolete and again 1-2 releases later I
would be fine to get rid of these multiple options...
Regards,
Rapha
- Option synonims, Paolo Redælli, 2022/03/15
- Re: Option synonims,
Raphael Mack <=