[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libreboot] Blocking Intel ME ?
From: |
Daniel Tarrero |
Subject: |
Re: [Libreboot] Blocking Intel ME ? |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Feb 2016 13:15:04 +0100 |
El mar, 02-02-2016 a las 16:46 +0530, Jay Aurabind escribió:
> On 30 January 2016 at 21:09, tech-info <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> >> In the mean time, logging traffic to spot odd packets is a great idea.
> >> People
> >> should document and publish malicious traffic from their networks.
> >
> > To be 100 % sure, this has to include a professional pentester who
> > checks the traffic. Because methods to hide "malicious traffic" inside
> > the "allowed traffic" do exist.
> >
> > Gerd
> >
> >
>
> I read that Intel ME will not load firmware unless its signed by Intel
> and that if signature verification fails, the ME core shuts down. In
> that case, why dont we just make a fake firmware and force it to load
> the fake one ? This way the ME core will remain shut down everytime it
> boots, isnt it ?
>
>
that doesn't change the thing that, maybe loading a faulty firmware is a
fast and dirty (ou yeah) way to disable iME ^^
Anyways we need reliable methods to check it