Re: [lp-ca-on] March Mumble Meeting

[Bob Jonkman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I don't mind being recorded either, and would prefer a Free Culture
license too.

- --Bob.


On 2016-03-23 01:18 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 23 2016, Blaise Alleyne wrote:
> 
>> On 23/03/16 10:01 AM, Reid Ellis wrote:
>>> Long-time lurker, first time poster here. :-)
>>> 
>> 
>> Welcome!
> 
> Welcome, too :-).
> 
>> 
>>> Any chance the mumble meeting can be/is recorded so that we
>>> lurking masses can listen to them later? [...] If there is no
>>> recording, is it ok to leave myself connected, recording audio?
>>> I could upload the (ogg encoded!) recording to archive.org
>>> later.
>> 
>> *shrugs* I don't mind? Whether or not it can be recorded via
>> Mumble would be a Sergio question I guess.
>> 
>> I imagine as long as everyone in the meeting knows it's being
>> recorded, it's not a problem?
> 
> I don't mind as well.
> 
> The Mumble desktop client can record the conversations, and it's
> even smart enough to offer recording all in one track or each
> person in its own track.  It's very nice for podcasts, TBH (I
> honestly don't understand why people still use Skype for this, but
> that's another question...).
> 
> So yeah, you're welcome to leave your client connected and record,
> if you want.  And while at it, if someone else wants to record as
> well, feel free to do so.
> 
>>> I guess I would use the same CC BY-ND 4.0 license that GNU uses
>>> <https://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/>?
>>> 
>> 
>> My vote would be for a libre license, like CC BY or BY-SA.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Ensure confidentiality, authenticity, non-repudiability

iEYEARECAAYFAlby55UACgkQuRKJsNLM5ert5wCg0J7JFZQ66EKdJka7xPpD9lYm
PaQAn1rsrsTdmVs65ba2mrtX7vwy5t3d
=je31
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----