[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] TurboCash
From: |
Adam Bolte |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] TurboCash |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2014 09:46:15 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:47:38AM -0600, David Loyall wrote:
> There was this non-free game for PC called Descent, back in the mid
> nineties. (It wasn't called a non-free game back then, it was just
> called a cool game!) At some point, the source was re-licensed as
> free software, but not the artwork, and the build depended on non-free
> compilers. For a year or so, folks who had access to those compilers
> were releasing binaries, new builds of the game, and all along they
> were also working to make it build under gcc. Long story short: they
> eventually succeeded and many derivative projects have been created,
> including http://packages.debian.org/unstable/d2x-rebirth .
I understand the point you are trying to make, however the dxx-rebirth
project is a bad example. The license for that says that the software
is restricted to non-commercial, royalty or revenue free purposes,
etc. It actually sounds quite restrictive.
According to the free software definition page:
"A free program must be available for commercial use, commercial
development, and commercial distribution."
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
As such, it cannot be considered free software.
-Adam
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature