libreplanet-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreplanet-discuss] support me


From: hellekin
Subject: Re: [libreplanet-discuss] support me
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:35:12 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 03/06/15 12:45, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> 
> AGPL is a must for stuff like web services
> 
*** +1

I would expect Gitlab to stand for software freedom and shutdown this
controversy.  Gitlab is a great step away from Github, as it offers
self-hosting.  But if Sytse Sijbrandij won't distinguish himself from
Tom Preston-Werner, the march towards software freedom stops there.

The comment highlighted earlier [0] by the Libreboot team, saying that
"MIT [...] has the least amount of restrictions for everyone" makes it
clear who "everyone" is (not us).  The arguments supporting the license
switch away from "MIT" to a proprietary license for Gitlab EE [1] build
on the same bullshit arguments that the open-source people use(d)
against free software: *confusion with price*.

Then the FSF should take extra care to provide a working narrative that
can convince business-oriented people that in the 21st Century, global
cooperation is a much stronger business model than competition.

With the honorable end of Gitorious enabled by Gitlab Inc., the free
software community has an opportunity to gather around the AGPL banner
and build long term trust in a cooperative platform for sharing code.
Or to divide again and split the effort to duplicate once more the same
functionality.

When Gitlab appeared as a Github clone, I was very happy, because Github
was way way better than the existing Web-based code repositories (and
still is for the most part).  Gitlab was a big surprise as they caught
up on Github.  The Gitlab EE license switch was a terrible decision, but
since the Gitlab CE moved on, providing much better functionality than
SF.net (eaten by some corporation), GNU Savannah (stalling in the
distant past), or Gitorious (ranging from clunky to unusable), it was
still better than nothing.

Can we think like we're in the 21st Century, and make software freedom
work (and earn) for itself, or are we going to waste more time and
energy believing in the superiority of proprietary software for
sustainable business?  Where is the FSF narrative for GNU Business?  Why
is it so difficult for Fortune 100 companies to accept the idea that
(A)GPL is good for their business?

==
hk

[0]:
https://about.gitlab.com/2015/03/03/gitlab-acquires-gitorious/#comment-1885545097
[1]: https://about.gitlab.com/2014/02/11/gitlab-ee-license-change/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=6T6T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]