Re: [libreplanet-discuss] support me

[Ali Abdul Ghani]

Hi LibrePlanet Hackers!
gitbull is ready
It  work well

https://gitbull.orggitbull run Kallithea,
Kallithea, its Free Software
 source code management system that supports two leading version
control systems, Mercurial and Git, and has a web interface that is
easy to use for users

GitBull refuse donation, but accept people support.
you can  help the project
In many ways! Here are some:

- Using gitbull, and sharing it with your friends and family
- Reporting issues and bugs that you find
- suggesting improvements
- bring your own improvement

thanks to libreplanet and the fsf that throught their
           existant have
            permit this project to happen
gitbull is a community coding
fan of codes are welcome.
github says they are social coding
gitbull - Community coding
Code is part of our community
Free code
 we are a community of people that love free software
gitbull is a free place for that type of coders.

--
ali abdul ghani


2015-03-11 17:03 جرينتش-08:00, Sytse Sijbrandij <sytse@gitlab.com>:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for understanding. GitLab consists of many moving parts and a
> tar-ball is not a very conventional way of distributing a ruby
> application. As you can see in
> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/install/installation.md
> installing it manually is quite a slug.
>
> Best regards,
> Sytse Sijbrandij
> CEO GitLab B.V.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Mike Gerwitz <mikegerwitz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 23:20:13 -0700, Sytse Sijbrandij wrote:
>>> Right now the homepage has an obvious download button, that links to
>>> https://about.gitlab.com/downloads/ this is the recommended way to
>>> install and it contains the source code (ruby is an interpreted
>>> language) although as plain files, not as a git repo.
>>
>> The downloads page lists Debian and RPM packages, which must either be
>> installed or unpacked using specialized tools.  I do see that there is a
>> "installation from source code" after clicking on the download button on
>> the homepage, then "alternative installation methods".  That was what I
>> was referring to.  Maybe a more prominent link to a source package
>> (preferably a tarball, which is traditional) on the downloads page could
>> be included?  The development kit, if that is preferred, is another
>> option, so long as it is clear that this is the preferred method for
>> obtaining source code.
>>
>>> A bit lower on the page the term 'open source' is a link that links to
>>> https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/tree/master
>>
>> Ah, I see---I expected that link to take me to an "open source"
>> definition.  But the downloads page is a good enough focus.
>>
>> I understand the rationale in your reply.  Balancing two distinct user
>> groups is not an easy task, especially when business depends on it.
>>
>> - --
>> Mike Gerwitz
>> Free Software Hacker | GNU Maintainer
>> http://mikegerwitz.com
>> FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVAOLDAAoJEPIruBWO4w6rTZEP/i2D7LvzQinjoeBRScDwGsAV
>> V6vSanhJm/7R07wi7hBwSw8PZeKw+F25dl8LLCAXLvRYVMdGzk5CuuT+K1qpe15I
>> awylCrB5qYqmiP3ie6d7aRhnpvEhMcTaV6duc8m0hx6g/HOWhEHrsiHtYEcMF95W
>> Bwh1gl9IhbyEd4jpJRT8s0TyFDaNJOhEx6TSLXX1d/5tBLI6mvvvoiO79F7Go4yM
>> sVf5GsKDy6WnoX5GaFIeqQE7y7Qre3+MUi1U2QiFs8wHBAIhI5d/QEiduj1nVdnh
>> yhU3MvRRQxg2ddez/yyLsFxbh5046m78ZnjQvMdlEjGmZnLzJWmyKXITRSCnPj+v
>> Yw08OC8hu9eUr0iXzAA+I1gr0XftApO8nSyhvy+Uoh4jT4+U0HPxFy9TOSmvYwb+
>> E0oHGOMgU/14YLmruhiFxJCiR3orXk7Rhu0YvLat0qb406BXVAs8ptVwNEkegfQr
>> HjXfXM+SfqVCRgFpZ1Qj2rHGQgtNj7elFjQVOg+L8gecQos8R64jvgF1BOLPTyYe
>> xguKinsDosigWz3qLwFdDholBHpZKRVV9Kpc6xDdeYZ6mEnuDnLLF61PB/3FokeC
>> lfDyh0rrczN587H6wwePfY8Tkhy6xbDpIPWj2sfgjA+QR1xCytTt6gt8MDEHqdyg
>> isxdEh6YHaqbmuvvoMWF
>> =LqiT
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


-- 
Think not of them, thou hast thy music too