[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Truly decentralized/federated software develop
From: |
Nicolás Reynolds |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Truly decentralized/federated software development platforms? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2015 08:26:37 -0300 |
rysiek <rysiek@hackerspace.pl> writes:
> Dnia wtorek, 17 marca 2015 01:03:55 Nicolás Reynolds pisze:
>> rysiek <rysiek@hackerspace.pl> writes:
>> > Hi there,
>> >
>> > the Gitlab/Gitorius situation rekindled my interest in what I would call
>> > the "next step" in software development management -- a truly
>> > decentralised/federated platform.
>> >
>> > First step could be to have different instances being able to "talk to
>> > each
>> > other", a bit like different Diaspora pods and Friendica servers talk to
>> > each other. So as to make pull requests, issue tracking, etc,
>> > near-seamless *across* different servers.
>>
>> https://github.com/toolmantim/bananajour
>
> This is pretty much awesome. :)
> I will be a heavy user of this little gem, thank you!
:)
> However, also not exactly what I have in mind here... As far as I understand,
> bananajour does not sport issue tracking, does it? That's something I'm
> actually looking for. Git is great for decentralized source code control, but
> we need something else for decentralized issue tracking (as per ESR's article
> I linked in the second leg of this thread).
there're some distributed issue trackers that reside on a branch of the
repo. i think the most maintained of this bunch is ticgit-ng
https://github.com/jeffWelling/ticgit
--
D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Truly decentralized/federated software development platforms?, אנטולי קרסנר, 2015/03/19