[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2016 04:37:41 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Most of the repositories listed are based on manifest files that contain
> license metadata about the package, but none of the underlying package
> managers contain means of:
> * disallowing non-FLOSS-licensed packages; or even so much as
> * ensuring the licenses of all libraries are compatible with each other.
Even better would be to make a rule for the repository
that only GPL-compatible free licenses are permitted.
That way, the package manager does not need to think about the issue.
Perhaps our versions of these repositories should reject all but
the GPL-compatible free packages.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager, Tyler Romeo, 2016/04/11
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager, Richard Stallman, 2016/04/18
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager, Fabio Pesari, 2016/04/24
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] programming language package manager, Yui Hirasawa, 2016/04/16