[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New versio
From: |
Luke Shumaker |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Jun 2016 00:54:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.5 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 00:00:38 -0400,
Luke wrote:
> On 06/11/2016 11:42 PM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> > 5. **Parabola and Arch Linux**: Parabola will produce an operating
> > system that is a Free version of the GNU/Linux system "[Arch
> > Linux](http://www.archlinux.org/)" and possibly other
> > Arch-based systems. We will provide repositories and installation
> > media without any non-Free software. All Parabola operating systems
> > will be backward compatible with the system they are based on, as to
> > help liberate already working installations. We will respect the
> > design philosophies of the systems ours are based on, to reduce
> > friction from both developer and user viewpoints.
>
> Overall the new layout you proposed seems reasonable, however I'm
> pretty sure that consensus was to not call it "Arch Linux" at all.
> This is in order to remain in good standing with the GNU project.
>
> Per a previous e-mail from RMS:
>
> > In this case, you have to choose to give this kind of respect
> > either to the developers of Arch GNU/Linux or to the GNU Project.
> > Respecting the former means joining them in disrespecting us.
I replied to RMS's email with essentially the wording that I included
in this version. Unfortunately, he didn't reply directly to mine..
> and...
>
> > > What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
> >
> > It avoids endorsing the error, so it is ok.
I think that the version I submitted also avoids endorsing the error.
Perhaps change the heading to just "Arch" and leave "Arch Linux" for
in the body?
> So #5 would have to look like this:
>
> > 5. **Parabola and Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)**: Parabola will
> > produce an operating
> > system that is a Free version of the GNU/Linux system
> > "[Arch](http://www.archlinux.org/)" and possibly other
> > Arch-based systems. We will provide repositories and installation
> > media without any non-Free software. All Parabola operating systems
> > will be backward compatible with the system they are based on, as to
> > help liberate already working installations. We will respect the
> > design philosophies of the systems ours are based on, to reduce
> > friction from both developer and user viewpoints.
>
> I also agree with part of a previous e-mail you sent concerning free
> software... let's not "waste a lot of precious time fighting among
> ourselves." We need to get the server migrated and prepare for FISL17
> instead.
:-)
--
Happy hacking,
~ Luke Shumaker
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, Luke Shumaker, 2016/06/11
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, Luke Shumaker, 2016/06/11
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, Luke, 2016/06/12
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract,
Luke Shumaker <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, Florencia Diaz, 2016/06/12
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, fauno, 2016/06/12
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, André Silva, 2016/06/12
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, Luke Shumaker, 2016/06/12
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, André Silva, 2016/06/13
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, André Silva, 2016/06/13
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, coadde, 2016/06/14
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, Isaac David, 2016/06/14
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, coadde, 2016/06/15
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract, André Silva, 2016/06/15