Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

[coadde]

On 06/13/2016 06:40 PM, coadde wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>>
>> The invariant sections in manuals under the GFDL are not part
>> of the documentation.  They are works of opinion.  That's what
>> makes them ethically legitimate, in our view.  The documenation is
>> free, but has to be accompanied with the statement of political
>> views that support the free software movement.
>>
>> It is self-defeating for an activity of the free software movement
>> to adopt rules against making sure its views reach the public.
> 
> I think you mean about it:
> 
> "with the exceptions of: non-modifiable license texts, works under the
> GNU Free Documentation License with invariant sections, and works of
> opinion."
> 
> Maybe the below example could solve it, eg:
> 
> with the exceptions of: works of opinion licenses like CC by-ND.[0][1]
> 
> [0]:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#FreeDocumentationLicenses
> [1]:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses

There are some references about free culture licenses that could be
useful for us:

http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses
http://freeculture.org/about/license

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature