[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[libreplanet-discuss] GNU GPL vs Consumer Guarantees Act
From: |
Kesara Rathnayake |
Subject: |
[libreplanet-discuss] GNU GPL vs Consumer Guarantees Act |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2016 22:12:31 +1200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
In one of the talks [1] on 2016 Kiwi PyCon (New Zealand's annual Python
conference) [2], the presenter mentioned that GNU GPL's "Disclaimer of
Warranty" is invalid against New Zealand consumer guarantee act [3] which
offers warranty against any goods or services consumed by consumers.
Does that mean if someone sells a GNU GPL software, is there a chance that
license could be invalid?
Can the “Consumer Guarantees acts" like these affect the original authors, even
though they didn't sell the software?
Cheers,
Kesara
References:
[1] https://youtu.be/S-Le3PWHqZA?t=696
[1] https://nzpug.org
[1] http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/DLM311053.html
- --
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFCBAEBCgAsJRxLZXNhcmEgUmF0aG5heWFrZSA8a2VzYXJhQGtlc2FyYS5saz4F
AlfWf4YACgkQgbKTpleptaHqZQf8CDLszfO/MJViqm6bicPAr8Icr8OWo78Dvh8y
L7SjR6OKazweH0oheWhZdqoAKSlz3IZkaEW22LmT8OwRY46vWNNPTlP+Q07tmcyG
HKAdKj4a6uvofOGOJYBZSV53ervCXQHj/t3P18ME4jGP1VnZlFUlLpm5kjzxgbuk
fHLFwL6ka/9wpGjdAZ+a4eaooSZIhvYJC1NUs3vlpFARfgN/+W7NzEwPTa3q5fbf
CkH3jdypGOoBJyft4eL3lhNAhO0upFnbexKJrTmOZaKlPj//fA0hoEj4UOQNpNJH
DCEJ909cV7Ab1Cm+/I386ih4UqdkWpzn///xIl3pefy9dMM8dg==
=QCQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [libreplanet-discuss] GNU GPL vs Consumer Guarantees Act,
Kesara Rathnayake <=