[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[libreplanet-discuss] a question to developers (not packagers) re. syste
From: |
Miles Fidelman |
Subject: |
[libreplanet-discuss] a question to developers (not packagers) re. systemd vs. sysvinit |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2017 09:57:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
Hi Folks,
The systemd vs sysvinit topic has popped up again on the Debian list
(and a few other places), and it occurs to me to wonder what's going on
from a developer perspective (rather than a distro or packager perspective).
Our own systems are pretty stable, so I haven't looked lately, but my
sense was that through it all DEVELOPERS were basically ignoring systemd
and continuing to ship traditional init scripts in tarballs - followed
by, either (or both):
a) things just run, because systemd recognizes traditional init scripts
(sort of), and/or,
b) packagers create systemd scripts
Which leads me to wonder the current state of the practice. So two
questions to software developers & maintainers (not packagers):
i. What kind of init scripts do you typically include in your code?
ii. To what extent do tooling & libraries support preparing each kind of
init script?
Inquiring minds want to know!
Thanks much,
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
- [libreplanet-discuss] a question to developers (not packagers) re. systemd vs. sysvinit,
Miles Fidelman <=