[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] ***SPAM*** Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF
From: |
Michael Rauch |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] ***SPAM*** Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:39:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 16.01.2019 03:28, Tom wrote:
> So I'm wondering, what are the views of those involved with the FSF
> regarding linked data and Solid? I'm wondering mainly about long term
> goals and ideals but am also interested in technical aspects as far as
> I'm able to understand them.
My personal view on RDF/LinkedData is that it opens up integration
possibilities for data and applications. Decentralization and openness
are at the core of the concepts and protocols. Therefore I see it as a
natural fit for any decentralized, bottom-up and open ecosystem.
I consider RDF/LinkedData still to be a niche and I see a need to lower
the barrier of entry to increase its adoption. I think that projects
like Wikidata and Openstreetmap are good catalysts.
As others have already mentionend, ActivityPub is workable and already
implemented in several projects [1]
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ActivityPub#Notable_implementations
Cheers,
Michael
- [libreplanet-discuss] Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF, Tom, 2019/01/16
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF, bill-auger, 2019/01/16
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF, J.B. Nicholson, 2019/01/16
- [libreplanet-discuss] Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF, Michael Rauch, 2019/01/17
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] ***SPAM*** Linked Data, Solid, and the FSF,
Michael Rauch <=