[libreplanet-discuss] Introductory documetation for free software (was: Easy to understand way of getting a new computer already setup out of the box as close as can be to rms' principles.)

[Dmitry Alexandrov]

Thomas Lord <lord@basiscraft.com> wrote:
> "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki@gmail.com>:
>> The way I find the answer is usually this: https://www.fsf.org/resources/ 
>> (third link) → https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw → 
>> https://www.fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement/respects-your-freedom → various 
>> links including <https://tehnoetic.com/TET-X200>, 
>> <https://store.vikings.net/libre-friendly-hardware/x200-ryf-certfied>, 
>> <https://minifree.org/product/libreboot-x200/>.
>>
>> Does this satisfy your requirements and do you think it's easy enough? Do 
>> you have suggestions for different ways to provide this information?
>
> No, that is not what I'm hoping to see.  Very few people will ever find those 
> links and fewer still have the knowledge to know how to use that information.

The thread seems to be broken, so I’ve lost: what was the question?  Federico 
evidently answers the question where to buy computers that would respect users 
freedom to the most extent possible nowadays.  It aligns with the subject.

What you’ve written below does not align with the subject well, though.

> Here is a scenario for thought experiment purposes:
>
> I have a minor role in Berkeley politics.  In this capacity, I sometimes have 
> occasion to try to interest the "real" politicians in software freedom, both 
> for their own use and for official use by the City.

Pushing people from using nonfree software right to ‘St. Ignucius’-level is a 
sure way to drive them away rather than interest them, though.

> One problem is that there is no material I've ever found on the fsf.org 
> website that serves as a good starting point for people.  I can't just "give 
> them a link".

Essays that explains the basic concepts of what free software is and why it is 
important for individuals and governments are published on https://gnu.org 
rather than on fsf.org.

If they prefer listening to reading, it might be also useful to direct them to 
the recording of one of the RMS’s speeches.

> The next problem arises if someone wants to try getting started.  Even if I 
> hand them a pre-loaded device, there is no GNU material to teach them basic 
> GNU (originally unix) concepts, basic system administration, and so on.

There is zero reason to teach people system administration when the goal is to 
persuade them to switch to _using_ free software.  They want use machines for 
their daily jobs, not administer them.

Where to send them to study introductory manuals is solely depends, on what 
free applications these manual should be.  GIMP is one thing, Moodle is another.

> Or similarly, consider the City IT department - a microsoft shop through and 
> through.  Good luck finding training materials they can adopt and adapt if 
> they want to put GNU systems on staff desktops

I do not quite understand, what topics should these materials cover?

> or get away from proprietary software on City servers.

I believe, that in year 2019 any competent IT department is fully capable to 
manage their servers without nonfree software (with exception of firmware and 
sometimes drivers).  If they are not doing that already, there is a specific 
reason for that: most probably, they need some very specific nonfree program.

> If GNU, with *help* from the FSF worked on that, one strategy might be to 
> start with very minimal systems -- nearly "classic unix-like"

Why?

> and little more -- simply to get a really solid foundation in place, and 
> build from there.

?

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature