[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: “should have had a warning / apology”
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
Subject: |
Re: “should have had a warning / apology” |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Oct 2019 20:13:13 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Wolf <wolftune@riseup.net> wrote:
> On 2019-10-12 3:20 a.m., Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
>> Aaron Wolf <wolftune@riseup.net> wrote:
>>> MBR posted a Facebook link (which should have had a warning/apology perhaps)
>>
>> I beg my pardon? Warning of / apology for what?
>
> Just like "sorry for Facebook link" or something (because Facebook is a
> company that works against most of the values we care about here).
Well, a good half of the Internet work against or at least contributes
something against freedom of computing. I do not think that _we_ have to
apologize for them.
> I checked just now that this particular link is visible publicly without
> JavaScript though, so I guess it's not too bad, relatively speaking.
Basically, it is not bad at all. :-)
But do you mean, that Facebook have other pages that are not readable without
running nonfree scripts?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature