[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?
From: |
Thomas Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses? |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jul 2021 11:25:35 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Roundcube Webmail/1.3.16 |
I agree that Danny Spitzberg makes a valuable clarification! I am not
advocating ineffectual gestures and self harm. I'm advocating socially
responsible engineering. Thank you, Danny.
-t
On 2021-07-09 11:04, Danny Spitzberg wrote:
Instead of quitting solo/individualistically, which makes no material
impact on any company, every tech worker should first consider talking
with and organizing with their fellow workers at their current
workplace.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 11:00 AM Thomas Lord <[1]lord@basiscraft.com>
wrote:
The copyright concerns seem minor until they're systematically
exploited (if ever).
Meanwhile, the product is basically "We've gotten really good at
cranking our reams and reams of very low quality code to the point
no computer user expects anything better and NOW, at last, we can
automate part of this process and make it go faster!"
Every tech worker should quit their job and go back to caring about
writing good software that helps people, working at sane paces,
and getting away from neglecting fundamentals including human need,
solid systems software, simplicity and in-the-field composibility
and
deep extensibility, documentation, accessibility, ... etc.
-t
On 2021-07-09 08:58, Danny Spitzberg wrote:
> Leslie gets it
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 8:57 AM J Leslie Turriff
> <[1][2]jlturriff@mail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 2021-07-07 14:04:02 Jean Louis wrote:
> > * alimiracle <[2][3]alimiracle@riseup.net> [2021-07-07
21:35]:
> > > its doesn't give you the same code.
> >
> > That for sure.
> >
> > > its rearrangement codes and integrate them, and then
gives you
> the
> > > result
> >
> > Yes, and that may be useful.
> >
> > > This thing make a lot of problems.
> >
> > Main problem is abuse of free software licenses.
> >
> > > - Makes programmers not creative
> >
> > I would not tell that too early. You know the libraries
that
> exist
> in
> > every programming language? They are often used and
re-used, for
> > example Python libraries, Node.js libraries, Haskell
libraries,
> Go
> > libraries, there are so many. One could say that libraries
make
> > programmers not creative as they are ready available.
> >
> > In fact, I like programming without using external
libraries.
> But
> > often it is useless to like it that way, libraries are
available
> and
> > trying to re-write something is reinventing the wheel, so I
end
> up
> > using external libraries.
> >
> > Libraries are often so much bigger than programming
snippets
> that
> the
> > free software license abusive AI tool we speak about will
> provide.
> >
> > Do libraries make programmers not creative? I don't think
it is
> so
> > generally. But in relation to the library they definitely
make
> > programmer not think about whatever library is providing.
In
> that
> > context programmer will stop creating because library is
already
> > there.
> >
> > With AI snippets is about similar.
> >
> > > Produces a generation of lazy programmers
> > > - Produces a generation of lazy programmers
> > > - Since the app collects codes and rearrange it
..........
> >
> > This may be said also for libraries. It is not useful to go
> analysing
> > it like that. One could say that because GUI exists for
specific
> > programing language, that such GUI makes programmers lazy.
> >
> > But programmers are lazy!
> >
> >
[3][4]https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=programmers+are+lazu
> >
> > [4][5]https://www.sarcasm.com/programmers-are-lazy/
> >
> > [5][6]http://threevirtues.com/
> >
> > According to Larry Wall(1), the original author of the Perl
> programming
> > language, there are three great virtues of a programmer;
> Laziness,
> > Impatience and Hubris
> >
> > Laziness: The quality that makes you go to great effort
to
> reduce
> > overall energy expenditure. It makes you write
labor-saving
> > programs that other people will find useful and
document
> what
> you
> > wrote so you don't have to answer so many questions
about
> it.
> >
> > Impatience: The anger you feel when the computer is
being
> > lazy. This makes you write programs that don't just
react to
> your
> > needs, but actually anticipate them. Or at least
pretend to.
> >
> > Hubris: The quality that makes you write (and maintain)
> programs
> > that other people won't want to say bad things about.
> >
> > > It means the app repeating other people's code mistakes.
> >
> > It can be, it is up to programmer to make it right.
> In the commercial programming environment, what
you're
> calling laziness is a necessity of
> the drive by management to produce product as quickly as
possible.
> (I spent thirty years
> in that environment.) Stealing code from one program for
another,
> or gutting a program
> to create a different one is the normal way of life in that
> environment. Of course,
> those programs were all property of the company, so there was
no
> issue of IP theft.
> The real drawback of using libraries is that one
doesn't
> have time to look at how the
> services that a library provides work, how reliable and safe
the
> library code is.
> In contrast, the snippets that this other service
provides
> are likely small enough for
> the programmer to be able to analyze, and as a side-effect
they
> further the programmer's
> knowledge of programming.
> Leslie
> --
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> [6][7]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
>
>
[7][8]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-dis
cus
> s
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:[9]jlturriff@mail.com
> 2. mailto:[10]alimiracle@riseup.net
> 3. [11]https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=programmers+are+lazu
> 4. [12]https://www.sarcasm.com/programmers-are-lazy/
> 5. [13]http://threevirtues.com/
> 6. mailto:[14]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
> 7.
>
[15]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discu
ss
>
> _______________________________________________
> libreplanet-discuss mailing list
> [16]libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
>
[17]https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discu
ss
References
1. mailto:lord@basiscraft.com
2. mailto:jlturriff@mail.com
3. mailto:alimiracle@riseup.net
4. https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=programmers+are+lazu
5. https://www.sarcasm.com/programmers-are-lazy/
6. http://threevirtues.com/
7. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
8. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discus
9. mailto:jlturriff@mail.com
10. mailto:alimiracle@riseup.net
11. https://html.duckduckgo.com/html/?q=programmers+are+lazu
12. https://www.sarcasm.com/programmers-are-lazy/
13. http://threevirtues.com/
14. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
15. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
16. mailto:libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org
17. https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, Danny Spitzberg, 2021/07/06
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, Jean Louis, 2021/07/07
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, alimiracle, 2021/07/07
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, Jean Louis, 2021/07/07
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, alimiracle, 2021/07/07
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, Jean Louis, 2021/07/08
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, alimiracle, 2021/07/08
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, J Leslie Turriff, 2021/07/09
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, Danny Spitzberg, 2021/07/09
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?, Thomas Lord, 2021/07/09
- Message not available
- Re: Is GitHub Copilot violates free software licenses?,
Thomas Lord <=