|
From: | Paul Sutton |
Subject: | Re: federated free software movement |
Date: | Mon, 15 Nov 2021 08:33:36 +0000 |
On 14/11/2021 20:27, Thomas Lord wrote:
I think the FSF should have gone in this direction a long time ago. I think it is a very good idea to add to what you described: a. Distributed decentralized business models that are NOT "getting paid to program" or "getting paid to contribute to a software development project". b. Those business models aimed at spreading the personal use of free software, and enjoyment of software freedom, by people who don't program or who don't identify as programmers c. That includes both service and HW provisioning components. d. These businesses should be designed to keep product prices low, to increase accessibility -- yet include enough of a human element to be hard to reproduce at large scale. e. The businesses should achieve real economies of scale through ... federation. Trivial boring example: Entry level desktops, preloaded, with support -- and a federation of those businesses that cooperates freely to maintain the shared distribution they use. Of course, that kind of thing can be infinitely specialized -- e.g. a federation of small businesses that provide DAWs (music production and performance software). The idea is to make enough money to live comfortably without trying to hoard software, supporting a lifestyle of cooperating on maintaining and extending that software freely. -t
+1We could add to this that the environmental impact is that we also get to use older hardware longer, I think there is some research somewhere on the cost making new laptops vs using older laptops for longer until they just stop working.
I know there are movements such as free cycle that that take hardware and recycle it, this also creates jobs etc.
Paul
What if there was a combined Free Software, OSHW and Right to Repair group, providing ideological leadership in a peer to peer fashion via federated services (including Git-based code hosting) and an emphasison teaching how to self-host your own federated hosting infrastructure?I'm discussing this on my twitter too: [1]https://twitter.com/n4of7/status/1459522798892859399 And on Mastodon. [2]https://mas.to/@libreleah/107270135261193137 However, I'm also seeking discussion here on this list. I wish to gauge the public's response before I proceed for real. Plus, I intend to bring people onboard to help me start this new initiative. References 1. https://twitter.com/n4of7/status/1459522798892859399 2. https://mas.to/@libreleah/107270135261193137 _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
-- -- Paul Sutton, Cert Cont Sci (Open) https://personaljournal.ca/paulsutton/ Pronoun : him/his/he OpenPGP : 4350 91C4 C8FB 681B 23A6 7944 8EA9 1B51 E27E 3D99
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |