[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not "open source" hardware, "free design" hardware
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: Not "open source" hardware, "free design" hardware |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2022 07:08:16 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 12:04:18AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
>
> > > Are you using "designs" with a different meaning? -- RMS
>
> > From my experience the word "hardware designs" usually refers to
> > schematics only,
>
> Does it include schematics of chips
> as well as schematics of boards?
Just a data point.
From my 20+ years professional experience of an electronics engineer,
hardware design usually includes schematics, layout, assembly drawings
and instructions (if any)---virtually all documentation used to
produce the device.
> so i would argue for more specific term to include
> > gerber files and everything relevant.
>
> I agree.
>
> What word can we use instead of "designs" to make it clear it includes
> these?
>
> How hard is it to make a layout, given a schematic?
The layouts for a device is typically harder to make than its
schematics; the gerber files (technically, gerber + drill files)
are made automatically from the layout in its source code form.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature