[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The beast is live - Github Copilot
From: |
J Leslie Turriff |
Subject: |
Re: The beast is live - Github Copilot |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:35:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On 2022-06-27 17:50:46 Yuchen Pei wrote:
> On Sun 2022-06-26 17:25:24 -0700, Marc Sunet wrote:
> >> I feel that one difference between the values of free software and open
> >> source is that the free software does not have a problem with taking
> >> people's work and re-selling it, as long as the work being resold is
> >> free. Whereas open source focus more on what authors get out of "open
> >> source".
> >
> > And in this case it is SaaSS. Not only is it trained on the existing
> > code in the repositories, it also seems to siphon code off your editor
> > as you type:
> >
> > https://github.com/features/copilot/#faq-privacy
>
> Of course there are ways to make it not SaaSS or privacy invading, if
> one is going to work on a free software version of copilot - all they
> need to do is not replicate the antifeatures.
>
> >> GitHub Copilot relies on file content and additional data to
> >
> > work. It collects data both to provide the service and saves some of
> > the data to perform further analysis and enable improvements.
> >
> >> Depending on your preferred telemetry settings, GitHub Copilot may
> >
> > also collect and retain the following, collectively referred to as
> > “code snippets”: source code that you are editing, related files and
> > other files open in the same IDE or editor, URLs of repositories and
> > files paths.
>
> Best,
> Yuchen
My take on this is that software authors who value control of their
code are well advised
to move it to another repository.
Leslie
--
Operating System: Linux
Distribution: openSUSE Leap 15.4 x86_64
Desktop Environment: Trinity