[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Microsoft's revenue structure
From: |
Federico Leva (Nemo) |
Subject: |
Re: Microsoft's revenue structure |
Date: |
Fri, 17 May 2024 08:38:25 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Il 15/05/24 04:49, Marc Sunet ha scritto:
Which reminds me, how is it still legal for an OEM to ship a "default"
OS in a computer without giving the customer any choice [...]? Has this been an
avenue of research for the FSF or some other organization lately?
It's already illegal in the EU, according to multiple court rulings
applying the EU treaties.
https://fsfe.org/news/2014/news-20140912-01.en.html
https://fsfe.org/news/2021/news-20210302-01.en.html
https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/WindowsTaxRefund
It's no mystery that Microsoft engages in industrial-scale illegality
nevertheless. Nowadays many orgs focus their antitrust enforcement
activity on the newest tool in the block, the DMA: «Device Neutrality is
the policy concept to regulate monopoly over devices and re-establish
end-user control over their digital equipment. The Digital Markets Act
(DMA) regulates the economic activity of large digital platforms and
introduces Device Neutrality into EU legislation, fostering access to
Free Software in devices».
https://fsfe.org/activities/dma/dma.html
Federico