Re: [libunwind] thoughts for future development

[David Mosberger-Tang]

Sounds fine to me.

IIRC, I introduced the L* files because I couldn't figure out how else
to get automake to do the right thing, but I'm sure there must be a
better way to do this.  The extra files do cause a lot of annoying
clutter.

 --david

On 5/9/06, Richard Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> At present, there's a whole lot of busy work that one must
> perfom to port to a new target.  I think the sets of things
> that would help here are:
>
> (1) Remove the L*.c files.  All these object files can be
>     built via makefile rules.
>
> (2) Reorganize the dwarf code such that more of the code
>     is shared.  In particular, the missed initialization
>     bug fixed yesterday shouldn't have been able to happen.
>
> I'll be working on this shortly, as well as adding support
> for a good many more targets.
>
>
> r~
> _______________________________________________
> libunwind mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/libunwind/


--
Mosberger Consulting LLC, http://www.mosberger-consulting.com/