libunwind-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libunwind-devel] SIGSEGV Segmentation Fault in access_mem


From: Ali Nakipoglu
Subject: Re: [Libunwind-devel] SIGSEGV Segmentation Fault in access_mem
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:42:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0


On 20/06/17 17:28, Dave Watson wrote:
On 06/20/17 03:15 PM, Ali Nakipoglu wrote:
Hi,

Hope everyone very well.

Im working on a memory tracking tool that gets linked at run-time via
LD_PRELOAD. It's using libunwind to get stack trace information. With most
of the test applications its working fine but, there is one that libunwind
always crashes with the stack trace:

#0  0x00007ffff7bbfe74 in access_mem () from /build-debug/Intercept.so
#1  0x00007ffff7bbf724 in _Ux86_64_step () from /build-debug/Intercept.so
#2  0x00007ffff7bbc2b8 in Intercept::trace() () at
/src/Intercept/Intercept.cpp:185
#3  0x00007ffff7bbc4c3 in calloc () at src/Intercept/Intercept.cpp:252
#4  0x00007fffe35f1b33 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/nvidia/libGL.so.1
#5  0x00007fffcb50302e in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#6  0x00007fffcb50c11b in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#7  0x00007fffcb50d1b8 in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#8  0x00007fffcb510c63 in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#9  0x00007fffcb6686f3 in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#10 0x00007fffcb63be54 in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#11 0x00007fffcb63d647 in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39
#12 0x00007fffcb655f24 in ?? () from
/usr/lib64/nvidia/libnvidia-glcore.so.375.39

Libunwind 1.2.1.

Is there a way to bypass it or its is a bug? Can CONSERVATIVE_CHECKS 
(https://github.com/pathscale/libunwind/blob/1fcbfc649837d2a28e1901986437ca6bf9c4f4d4/src/x86_64/Gstep.c#L61)
build flag solve this?
You can try CONSERVATIVE_CHECKS.  There is also a known issue if the
memory is mapped, but without PROT_READ.  A potential fix is here:

https://github.com/libunwind/libunwind/pull/7
Hi

I just tried CONSERVATIVE_CHECKS and it didn't help. Will try the pull request and let you know.

Many thanks!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]