[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Lilypond-auto] Issue 2943 in lilypond: [DOC] Centering dynamic
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
[Lilypond-auto] Issue 2943 in lilypond: [DOC] Centering dynamic |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:21:43 +0000 |
Status: Accepted
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Documentation
New issue 2943 by address@hidden: [DOC] Centering dynamic
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2943
Suggestion from user list (by james):
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2012-10/msg00561.html
Notation reference, 1.3.1 is where I got the example which I have been
using since at least 2.12, because centering such a new dynamic is
probably rarer than having it left-aligned, I think it would be useful to
note that there's an easy way of doing this. A minor change from the
example in the documentation.
\version "2.14.0"
rinforzaF = #(make-dynamic-script
(markup #:normal-text "rinforza"
#:dynamic "f"))
tweekRinforzaF = \tweak DynamicText #'self-alignment-X #-1
#(make-dynamic-script
(markup #:normal-text "rinforza"
#:dynamic "f"))
\relative c' { f16 f f f f f f f f\rinforzaF f f f f f f f }
\relative c' { f16 f f f f f f f f\tweekRinforzaF f f f f f f f }
I think the extension that happen to lilypond are a good thing, I have no
problem with them. I don't have to understand all of them. I know that when
these extensions happen, updating the documentation becomes an extremely
arduous task. From a certain point of view, it's not really feasible to
update everything in the documentation that's easier because of something
that's changed in lilypond. I think, however, this would be a great place
to make a change that certainly would have helped me.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2943 in lilypond: [DOC] Centering dynamic,
lilypond <=