[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call
|
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
|
Subject: |
Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call |
|
Date: |
Fri, 07 Jul 2023 14:58:44 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.48.3 (3.48.3-1.fc38) |
Le vendredi 07 juillet 2023 à 14:43 +0200, Jean Abou Samra a écrit :
> Le vendredi 07 juillet 2023 à 14:15 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit :
> > Yikes. Looks like the bytecode compiler/optimizer/whatever converts (- ) or
> > something like it into (- 0 )
> Indeed.
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=64508
Maybe try just overloading (- <number> <Pitch>). Otherwise just revert the
patch.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Dan Eble, 2023/07/07
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, David Kastrup, 2023/07/07
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/07/07
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call,
Jean Abou Samra <=
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, David Kastrup, 2023/07/08
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Dan Eble, 2023/07/08
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/07/09
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, David Kastrup, 2023/07/09
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/07/09
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, David Kastrup, 2023/07/09
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Jean Abou Samra, 2023/07/09
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Dan Eble, 2023/07/09
- Re: No applicable method for #<<generic> - (4)> in call, Werner LEMBERG, 2023/07/09