|
From: | Simon Albrecht |
Subject: | Re: NR appendices D and E are confusing |
Date: | Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:19:47 +0100 |
Hi Trevor,I think you’re not wrong, and it’s entirely fair for you to feel that way. However, I doubt how common your frustration is.
On 17.12.24 19:34, Trevor Bača wrote:
The problem is that the duplication of content between NR-D and NR-E takes a toll on the usability of the docs for many readers.
Are you sure it’s “many readers” who can’t get used to the two indices and find them useful? I don’t have any polling either, but there’s a reason it is the way it is.
For me, the most common use case for the indices _by far_ is: hmm, I want to use music function/command \fooBar and don’t remember the exact arguments I have to pass along/the order of the arguments/the default values/…
So I go to Appendix D and click the link to the reference. Maybe you’re right and I could just get used to Ctrl+F the command in Appendix E, but the way it is I feel like Appendix D is quicker and easier to use for most cases.
We’d definitely need more opinions, especially from folks like Werner who have worked on the docs/appendices a lot, as well as from users: how do they feel about it? How much do they use which index?
Best, Simon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |