[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Music function arguments
From: |
Trevor Bača |
Subject: |
Re: Music function arguments |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:48:54 -0600 |
On 12/14/05, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> Trevor Bača wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I agree, if for no other reason than to reduce the number of flips
> > over to the manual while inputting.
> >
> > Of course, it probably would be better for *everything* to be
> >
> > \command "arg"
> >
> > removing the kinda alien-looking (if you're not a scheme programmer)
>
> ACtually, this turned out to be trivial to do. I'm not sure why I didn't
> do it earlier.
Well hallelujah. This part of the peanut gallery says go for it before
the userbase gets any bigger (resulting in more backwards
compatability complaints).
--
Trevor Bača
address@hidden
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, (continued)
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/12/13
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Erik Sandberg, 2005/12/13
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/12/13
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/12/13
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Erik Sandberg, 2005/12/14
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Trevor Bača, 2005/12/14
- Music function arguments, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/12/14
- Re: Music function arguments,
Trevor Bača <=
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Henrik Frisk, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Karl Hammar, 2005/12/16
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Nicolas Sceaux, 2005/12/16
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Syntax, Arno Waschk, 2005/12/15
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Jonatan Liljedahl, 2005/12/13
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/12/14
- Re: Invisible notes, Scheme contexts, Andrzej Kopec, 2005/12/14