[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better Midi, anyone?
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Better Midi, anyone? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 19:16:34 -0700 |
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:08:05 +1100
Peter Chubb <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>> "Graham" == Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> Graham> The above points are possibly with a macro: instead of simply
> Graham> moltorit = \markup{ \italics molto rit }
>
> The point is that for the Artemis competition we have to start with
> unmodified Lilypond input. So we have to recognise, say
> c'^"rit." or c'^"rall" etc., and convert to \tempo 4=60 or
> whatever.
Oh. Ooooh. Yikes. Including all English / Italian / French /
German / etc variations of "slow down"?!
Hmm. I was thinking of something completely different here. I
agree with Rune; I don't know why they chose lilypond for this
contest -- or at the very least, why they didn't specify a subset
of normal lilypond code.
Sorry, I can't help with this.
Cheers,
- Graham