[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Moving objects using "wrong" extent --- a question, valid solution neede
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Moving objects using "wrong" extent --- a question, valid solution needed! |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2010 13:57:51 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Hi!
I've found that it's possible to move objects (scripts, dynamics..) with
"wrong" Y-offset so that they start to overlay other objects --- specifying
Y-offset like #'(1 . -1) or like that *) :
% ----------------- 8< ---------------------------
byte = { c \> c c c \! \break }
\relative c''' {
\byte
%
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-extent = #'(1 . -1)
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-offset = #0
\byte
%
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-extent = #'(1 . 0)
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-offset = #3.141592653589793
\byte
%
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-extent = #'(0 . -10)
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'Y-offset = #-4
\byte
}
\addlyrics {
la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la la
}
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
indent = 0
between-system-spacing = #'((space . 16))
}
% ----------------- 8< ---------------------------
So, now "i have a lot of questions", specifically:
1. Is it "valid" way? May this behavior be changed?
2. Which way would be more "valid"?
I need something like this to "mimic" some author's manuscripts for some
specific purpose. So would be glad to get any feedback.
Thanks!
_________
*) currently if any extent, upper or lower, is "invalid" it's enough; number
may be any of [1 .. +inf), it does not matter.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
movingObjects.png
Description: PNG image
- Moving objects using "wrong" extent --- a question, valid solution needed!,
Dmytro O. Redchuk <=